Thursday, March 23, 2017

Part 3: Creating your Weekly Plan

In the last couple posts, I have discussed the benefits and reasons behind the popularity of indoor training, and how to get started with it by performing an FTP test to help you determine your power training zones in order to create workouts that have specific performance goals. In this post, I'm going build on all of that information to help you structure your training week. I'm not going to give you a 6-week plan or something aimed at nailing your next race because it would not be very beneficial given that everyone will have so many different needs of emphasis in their training, and the different events/races that individuals will be training for. But if you have any more individual questions or want some advice leave a comment or send message on Facebook. Even if you don't agree with some of the stuff I have in this post because a couple of the topics covered are a little controversial, feel free to share your opinion.

Now, I've said this probably in every training discussion that I've ever had on this blog, the number one thing to keep in mind when putting together any training schedule, or specific workout, is to be able to clearly answer the question of "What is the purpose/goal of this workout, and how is this going to help me on race day." I think too many people see a workout maybe in Runner's World Magazine, or Triathlon Magazine, or maybe even a video of a workout on Flo Track and think alright that's what I'll do today, without actually ever thinking about how is this going to benefit them personally. Sometimes it makes me laugh, when FloTrack asks a coach about the workout and the coach takes a few minutes stumbling around an answer to the purpose of the workout. You should be able to answer the question pretty easily and quickly. It should be something like, "Coach what is the purpose of this interval workout today," "Increase VO2 max," or maybe "Increase lactate threshold." Yes of course some workouts have multiple benefits such as Tempo runs which not only help increase lactate threshold, but also help psychologically get accustomed to running comfortably fast for a long period of time, but no matter what you should know, understand, and have a clear purpose to each and every workout. And I'm not only talking about those hard epic interval workouts, sometimes a run's or bike's purpose may simply be to ride/run off some soreness.

On a bigger scale, not only do you need to be able to have a clear purpose to the individual workout, but you should have a clear over-arching goal or something you are working towards for the entire season (or period/phase within the season) to help you channel your effort. For this next section, initially I was going to give you a sample training schedule, then I changed it to show my normal weekly schedule, but now after having rewritten this section twice already, I think I'm going to just explain some basic principles to keep in mind when organizing your weekly training schedule. The reason I changed the format of this section a couple times now, is because I felt it wouldn't benefit all readers since we all have different goals, abilities, amounts of time available to train, and different strengths and weaknesses. So now let's get to it. Creating a training plan for self-coached athletes can seem like a daunting task because as I explained in my last post there are so many different workouts that can be done on the bike or run or swim, each with its own unique physiological stimulus forcing specific adaptations. But in order to start planning you need to first look at what is your goal event and what is going to be required in order for you to be successful in that particular event. For example, if your a pure cyclist who is targeting relatively flat road races like ones in Ontario, you know that you'll need to improve your endurance to be able to stay with the pack throughout the long race, but also improve your sprint power at the end of the race to be able to pull away and break the finish line first. If your goal is say to complete a 100 mile ride, or maybe a charity ride like the Ride to Conquer Cancer, then you know you'll just have to gradually increase the distance of your long ride to improve your endurance to be able to successfully complete the distance. If your goal is to perform time trials, or long course triathlon like the half-ironman or full ironman, then you know you have to work on sustained power. In the case of half-ironman improving your FTP over time to improve your aerobic power capacity, and improve your ability sustain anywhere from 80-85% of that FTP for 2 hours or more. After you know what the goal is you need to take into account how much time you have to train. In addition to training time, you need to also take into account recovery time between hard training sessions. And speaking of recovery time this is good place to talk about the number of hard workouts or types of workouts you are doing in a single week. I mentioned in the last post that there are 7 different power zones, however that doesn't mean that you need to spend time in all 7 zones each week. Too many people get overwhelmed designing their training schedule thinking that they must have a sweet spot workout, a VO2 max workout, a threshold workout, an endurance workout, an anaerobic workout, a tempo workout and recovery ride all in one week. That is simply not the case. The types of workouts you will be doing depends a lot on what time of the year it is (having a periodized training schedule which I've discussed in previous posts), and other factors such as what are your specific weaknesses that you are trying to improve, and again what are the specific fitness demands of the race. I like to have very a specific emphasis to each individual training block and that's how I like to organize my workouts. So for example a couple training blocks ago my goal was to improve my FTP in the 5-week span (which I did by an entire 5%). This last training block my goal was to improve VO2 max which it hard to tell that I really did physiologically speaking because I don't have access to a testing lab, however I saw major gains in the power I was able to sustain in a few of the key telling workouts.

When you start creating your weekly schedule the next thing to do, taking your goal event into account, is to schedule the key workouts (workouts that are the most important for your goals) into the week and build the rest of the week around those workouts. The key workouts are usually going to be the toughest, most race specific workouts. So if you are training for a half-ironman your key bike workout will be a longer bike with multiple intervals of 20 minutes or longer at your goal race wattage in Zone 3 into Zone 3.5 (Sweet Spot). To make it as race specific as possible you can couple those bike workouts with a run off the bike to get used to running after an effort like that. If your say a half-marathon runner I would say your key workouts for the week are your tempo run (or cruise intervals), speed interval session, and long run, the rest of the week is mostly just easy runs scheduled around those runs. Next, in terms of the organizing your weekly schedule and the workout pattern, most coaches go by the hard-easy schedule simply meaning you go hard one day, then easy, hard, then easy, etc. Others go by a block training approach where you string together numerous hard days in a row followed by a little more extended recovery to soak in the training adaptations. In my opinion, a block training approach is for a more experienced athlete as it does require a higher base training load to work off of, and more motivation since as you get deeper and deeper into the training block it becomes tougher and tougher to push through some of the workouts since the fatigue is progressively accumulating. Unlike distance running, in triathlon, organizing your weekly training schedule is obviously much more complicated since you need to balance the training load across three different sports, and the timing and ordering of your sessions becomes critical. Looking back on the days where I was only running, I spent much less time thinking about the organization of my training schedule. Really the formula was simple, each week was quite similar to the last in terms of its structuring of the workouts but the mileage or number of intervals in each individual session would just get longer or increase until race day, then the mileage would drop again, and then would start the process back over from scratch, maybe this time reaching a new height in mileage, or new height in terms of number of intervals at a certain pace completed or a faster pace across the same number of intervals. In triathlon, you are constantly having to deal with the crossover fatigue from one sport to the next, especially when it comes to cycling and running since the muscles used are very similar. Although some people like to say that swimming is its own monster, and could be dealt with separately because it uses different muscles than those two sports, I don't believe this to be entirely accurate for a number of reasons. Yes, running and cycling do share more in common with one another than swimming but you still have to deal with the overall body fatigue both physically and mentally that your cycling and running will cause, and also swimming and cycling/running still do share some similarities in muscle use. Looking at the lower body for instance do you use your glutes on the bike - for sure, what about in the pool - well how else do you kick. What about your calves: when biking and running - absolutely, when your swimming think about that strong explosive push off the wall, or how about the dolphin kick when your doing butterfly.
Basically, what I'm saying is anyone who says swimming can be considered entirely separate from cycling/running has obviously never done a 2-3 hour hard bike or tough hilly run straight into a long swim (especially one that starts with a kick set in the warmup). In terms of my own training, I can definitely speak to this point since I tend to do my swim workout as the second workout of the day usually with a run beforehand, and on Wednesday's and Saturday's a tougher bike session before. And when I say beforehand I mean that the time between my run workout finishing and the start of the swim is in the range of 10 minutes, and I can tell you that I have had many swims where my legs feel like lead in the water thanks to the hard run or bike before.

So how do you design your weekly schedule to get around some of this crossover fatigue to make sure your workouts are still of high quality? Well one strategy you can use is stringing together a couple very tough sessions on the same day and within close proximity time-wise of one another. What this does is it kind of tricks your body into thinking it is still fresh since the fatigue of the first hard workout hasn't quite kicked in yet. Afterwards though you will need a little more extended recovery time from the two hard sessions in a row - and for sure two good heaping scoops of Infinit Repair -- I really don't mean this to be such a blatant sponsor plug but the honest truth is I've had so many workouts in the last couple months where I feel completely spent and it takes all my strength to climb upstairs from the pain cave in the basement, but when I get up to my big case of Infinit and have my bottle it makes me feel like I can function again. Now this topic of stringing the two hard workouts on the same day is a controversial one. Some say that by doing this the quality of the second workout will suffer and therefore may not be as specific to what you are trying to accomplish. For example, if you do a big long threshold session on the bike and then go for run a workout a few hours later where the aim is to do 12x400 at 3:00/km pace (72s - VO2 max pace) but you end up doing 76s which is closer to your threshold pace because your knackered from the bike then you've lost the purpose of the workout. Instead, people who advocate this approach suggest that you do your hard bike one day and the hard run another. But again I think it all depends on what your goals are and your own physiology. Some people are just better at others at recovering quickly after a hard workout (and this is where nutrition during and after is very important) and could therefore handle the two hard workouts the same day. And while some say doing your hard bike and run workout on the same day can lead to injury and the quality of the second workout suffering, I could argue that doing your hard bike on say Monday and then hard run on Tuesday can lead to injury and poor performance just as easily since A) your never really getting an easy day in between and therefore your training is looking more like the block training approach which is only really for very experienced athletes who have a big training load to begin with, and B) your run may end up suffering all the same thanks to DOMS (delayed onset muscle soreness) - that soreness in your legs about 24 hours a hard effort. I mentioned it also depends on what your goals are since people who advocate not doing the hard bike and run on the same day could say instead of doing hard bike Monday and hard run Tuesday where yes you could be feeling the effects of DOMS and the quality would suffer, you could just do the hard bike Monday, easy day Tuesday, then hard run Wednesday, easy Thursday and so fourth. However, for someone who is going for the podium like myself, an approach like this would mean that your really only doing 1-2 quality bikes, and 1-2 quality runs in the week (1-2 because it would mean under this scenario the following week has 2 hard bikes and only 1 hard run). Because the long run and long bike for the week count as one of your high TSS (high strain sessions) then other than those two workouts you could only have 1 hard/faster run session, and 1 harder (higher power) bike session a week, and on following week where you only get 1 hard run and two hard bikes anyways then other than your long run you won't have any speedy run session in that entire week. And to add to matters, I think all triathletes should have a brick session in their week since being able to run off the bike is kind of important for the race, and so now where does that fit in - because a bike/run brick really no matter the intensity is always a taxing session just by its nature. So it really all goes back to your own goals, and abilities (and this is why I didn't give a sample program) because some people can handle a hard bike and hard run on the same day, and then have very easy day the next day to recovery, while others who maybe don't require such a high training volume/load to achieve their own goals could be successful with the second approach of having 1-2 hard bikes a week, and 1-2 hard runs a week. For me personally, I recover very quickly from one workout to the next thanks to years of maintaining a very high training load, and having run two-a-days for years, and also really taking my nutrition seriously, therefore I can handle the two big workouts on the same day. One tip I could add if you decide to go the route of the hard workouts on the same day is to put the harder more important session first. So if doing a hard run workout of say 8x1km at VO2 max pace and the hard bike is maybe 3x20minutes of steady sweet spot power, put the run first (it is higher intensity in that case). If just starting out in triathlon though I would recommend the approach of splitting up the hard bike and run sessions with an easy day in between.

So with that information you can start planning your weeks. I would recommend starting with the hard/easy training principle over the block training approach, since it takes quite a long time to build up to the point of being able to the handle stringing multiple tough days in a row. Also a hard/easy setup to training will keep things less monotonous, and it can help you avoid burnout/injury. An interesting post by Craig Taylor who is Coach for Regional Triathlon Centre in Guelph (http://provincialtriathloncentre.blogspot.ca/2009/01/micro-structure-part-1.html) looked at a couple studies on microcycle structure (weekly training structure) which essentially showed that the less monotonous the training load the less chance of injury/illness. To summarize, in the first study, the research group put a group of horses on a training program for 260 days. They alternated 1 hard day with 1 easy day, and over the 260 days the easy days always stayed the same, and the hard days got progressively harder and longer. For those 260 days the horses thrived. On the 261st day the researchers started to progressively increase the training load on the easy days, and the horses only lasted 12 days before the experiment had to be stopped because the horses couldn't handle the training load. The second study showed the more monotonous a training schedule the higher chance of injury/illness. Monotony refers to the variation from training load from one day to the next. So if you have two athletes who both do the same 21 hours of training in a week but structure there weeks like so
Athlete A is more likely to get an injury/illness than Athlete B because every day they are training the same amount therefore the monotony is higher meaning the strain is higher. 


To summarize, things to consider for putting your weekly schedule together are:

1) What is your goal event?
2) How much time do you have available to train (and maybe more importantly recover from workouts)?
3) What are you strengths, and what are you weakness that you need to work on to be successful in your goal event? Furthermore, what are the very specific demands of that event. For half-ironman bike leg is it a hilly course and if so are the hills short and steep, or gradual and long (hopefully not both steep and long). Looking at the demands of your specific event will then help you to decide on the nature of your key workouts that need to be spaced out between the week's schedule.
4) Start planning your weekly schedule you can either do your hard bike and hard run on the same day to minimize crossover fatigue, or you could do your hard bike workout followed by an easy day then the following day your hard run workout again followed by an easy day, and keep alternating that pattern.
5) When planning your weeks remember that you don't necessarily need to hit every single training zone. In fact, some can argue that some athletes will never need to tap into some of the training zones -- Does a full ironman triathlete need to do microburst intervals in Zone 7? Probably not since you would never need to do that in a race. Generally for a half-ironman bike leg your key sessions will be from zone 3-5 (Tempo zone to practice pacing and getting comfortable with sustained power for long periods of time, lactate threshold like over-under intervals to increase lactate threshold and push that FTP a little higher, and VO2 max training to increase your overall and maximal aerobic capabilities).
6) When organizing the pattern to your weekly schedule as Craig Taylor explained in his post vary the training load from one day to the next to minimize the monotony and therefore lower the overall strain and chance of injury, and to do this alternate hard days with easy days but make sure to go Hard on those hard days and Easy on the easy days.

So there you have it. I could probably go on about the various themes and principles introduced in this post into much more depth, and yes many will have conflicting opinions on some of the topics, but this will give you a good idea I think of how to start plotting your weekly schedule. The ideas here are just my take on things, that have been formed from a combination of my own training philosophies with what I have learned through reading many training books and training articles from world renowned coaches. For a more individual questions about your schedule feel free to leave comment below and I'll respond right away.


Saturday, February 25, 2017

Indoor Training Part 2

Continuing from where my last post left off, I thought it would be beneficial to add a post about some basic workout principles, and the variety of different workouts that could be done on the bike.

First off, I just want to say that this post is not going to completely exhaust all the various workouts and all their respective physiological benefits; there is an entire book I would recommend if your really interested called Training and Racing with a Power Meter by Hunter and Coogan which is 350 pages of training principles, and workouts (Coogan who is the one behind the power zones that so many elites, amateurs, and weekend warriors use today). I also want to note that just like in running where you have some coaches calling your half marathon pace "T" pace, others call it Tempo Pace, with cycling there are a number of different power training zone schemas that have been proposed, the most popular being Andrew Coogan's, and Joe Friel's from the Triathlon Training Bible book. Personally I go by Coogan's formula since it is more similar to what I would use in running in terms of the terminology, and the terminology used for some like myself who has a exercise science background makes the most sense to me.

What are these zones and how do I set them up? I'll take you through the easy process (well easy in the sense that it doesn't take very long) of how to get started with them. So you've bought your smart trainer after reading my last post and learning about all the different things you can do with the trainer. Your pedalling along on Zwift and in the top left corner you see you power number says 200W. You say something like, "Oh this is so cool, look over here [parent] or [significant other] I'm pedalling at 200W." To what the reply is always, "Cool [sarcastically], is that good?" "Umm, uh, umm, I think so." What you really need to do to maximize the impact of your indoor training and training and racing performance in general is first to perform a Functional Threshold Power Test or an FTP test. "Oh no, a test, is it hard?" Well...hate to kind of calm your excitement from your new trainer for a bit, but an FTP is essentially the closest thing to hell on earth, other than the world as we know it with Trump as President. It is out and out a sufferfest, and no matter how many you've done you never really get over the butterfly feeling in your stomach, sweaty palms, fear, and the memories of being hunched over your bike over a puddle of sweat and tears weeping like a baby when your getting ready for your next test. "So why should I need to do it?" An FTP test helps you to structure your training, get the most out of every workout, to pace yourself in long races so you don't blow up 10 miles to the finish, to track improvement over time and make adjustments as necessary, and to add the experience to your growing mental training folder** to reference it in times of need.

**While all elite athletes are extremely skilled at being able to essentially sever the lines of communication between there screaming/burning legs and their minds, all elite athletes and any endurance athlete in general will get to some point in a race when those signals coming in from their body are too much to ignore anymore. That is why it pays off to build a mental folder of all your training experiences and emotions to reference when you need to, to be able to tell (convince) yourself that everything is okay because we have been here before. Remember when on that training ride or run we felt this same thing, and it ended up being okay, so keep going. Basically when out training take notes constantly of your feelings and aches and pains, so that when out racing you have a huge folder of experiences to draw from. Just for some real world application, I'll give an example of how I did this. I've mentioned this many times before but in 2013 in my lead up to Scotiabank Marathon, I designed my own little Race Series called the Running on the Sun Series. It was mid-July and Toronto was experiencing the hottest heat wave in its history (and still is to this day). Daily temps w/ humidity were in the 40s. I decided during that four day stretch to put in at that time the biggest block of run training I had done - 152km in 4 days (38km/day), and was running outside around mid-day and then another run a little bit later without taking water during the runs (Disclaimer: I am not recommending this). I was returning from runs emaciated from the sweat loss and dehydration. But it meant every run for the rest of the summer I cruised along like I was now completely immune to the heat, and did well at Scotiabank because I had the memory of those July days out there baking in the heat to look back to and use as a comparator. Going down Queen Street I remember literally having a conversation with myself in my head saying, "You remember those 400/800s that day in July when it was 43, how much pain I was in and how much I wanted to stop, this is nothing, so keep going and stop complaining." 

Anyways that was a long winded way of saying that FTP tests, in addition to serving as a benchmark and a reference value for all your training, build mental toughness. So what is it and how do you do it? A FTP test is a 20 minute max power test, that helps to predict your maximum estimated 1 hour power. Why do a 20 minute power test to predict 1 hour power, and not just a 1 hour power test. Well because a 20 minute test can be repeated more regularly (every 6-8 weeks), whereas a 1 hour long test will take too long to recover from, which will impact your other training, and will require a more substantial taper to go into the test fresh. A 20 minute test on the other hand takes maybe a 2 day taper of going a little easier on the bike, and maybe one day easy afterwards. However, for myself personally, I don't perform well on an FTP test if i've rested too much on the bike leading into the test. Usually, a couple days out I like to do a little pre-test of a few 5-6 minuters at my goal power for the test to get my mind wrapped around the necessary power. Some people on the other hand will like to have 2-3 days of super easy riding to be as fresh as possible. For the test to be the most accurate and give you a true picture to your level, the software TrainerRoad (which I discussed in my last post) has I believe the best test method. It starts with a 30 minute all-encompassing warmup. The warmup includes three short 1 minute efforts which are all about leg-speed (cadence) and not too concerned with power. This helps to further ramp up the system, and warm your legs sufficiently prior to the test. Then after these efforts, TrainerRoad includes a 5 minute all-out effort just prior to the 20 min test. This 5 minute effort is the reason why I think that TrainerRoad's FTP test is the most accurate. While a 5 minute all-out effort may sound counter-productive just prior to going all-out for 20 minutes, I believe it is beneficial in a number of ways. First it further enhances the warmup, and more importantly it helps to burn off any anaerobic contribution to the test. The test is truly about the aerobic system's capabilities, so you need to eliminate that anaerobic contribution which could help you start very hard for the first minute and over-inflate the test results. For the test itself you would like to have the effort be as constant as possible start to finish, not starting too quick and having your power fall off a cliff the last few minutes, and conversely you don't want to start too conservatively, and then in the last 2-3 minutes be hammering a much higher power. For instance not starting out at 300 W, and then with 3 minutes to go ripping at 450W - that would indicate you started way to slow. At the end of the test you should be having to try with all your might to maintain the power, you shouldn't have anything left for a sprint to the finish. A perfect test therefore would be you start at say 340 W and the power doesn't drift outside of a few watts from 340 so maybe keeping the power between 337-343. If you have TrainingPeaks the variability index for the 20 minutes should be very low. Below is a picture from TrainingPeaks of my last test:
 The highlighted area is the 20 minute segment, and the variability index for my test was 1.00 meaning the average power and normalized were the same - meaning a perfectly consistent test (not to sound to arrogant). So that's the test. 20 minutes flat out. In my experience I usually find 11-13 minutes into the test to be the hardest. I just find its when fatigue is really starting to kick in, and at the same time you still have 7-9 minutes left which mentally can seem very daunting. But you can make it, just find different things to focus on. For me, I get through the first half repeating in my head stay calm, be patient, and keep it smooth. In the second half, I usually resort to trying to focus on my pedalstroke. So envisioning a perfect smooth circle, kicking my toes over the top, and pulling my heels across the bottom. If times get really tough, I have even got through tests by counting in my head 10-15 pedalstrokes for my left leg, then 10-15 for my right, and repeating that a couple times, and before you know it, you've knocked another minute down. After you finish, and have stopped sulking, and your breathing calms down you will get the result, say with that previous example you managed to keep 340W. Remember this is a 20 minute test used to predict your 1 hour max power, therefore your 20 minute power will be slightly higher than the 1 hour power, how much: 5%. So you take that 340W and multiply it by 0.95 and you would get 323 W, or TrainerRoad will do this for you, and that is your FTP. Now, besides 323W now being your FTP number with which you will set up your power zones (which I will explain in just a second), is that number any good? Well to help normalize the playing field and see where you stack up to the pros, you can take that power number and divide it by your weight in kilograms to give your W/kg value. And then Coogan, who analyzed many riders from world class to untrained cyclists, put together a great table showing where the W/kg for 5 second power to FTP lies for various ability levels (shown below).

Now finally the Zones 

So you have you FTP number now you can take that number and develop your training zones, or let TrainingPeaks or Strava or really any Premium online training software do that for you. With Coogan's formula he describes 7 different training zones: 
  1. Active Recovery (<55% FTP): can keep this power all day long, or commonly used during recovery between intervals. 
  2. Endurance (56-75% FTP): Can still keep this pace all day long for the most part. The upper end of this range at 75% FTP will definitely increase breathing rate, and would require some concentration to maintain, but you should still be able to hold a conversation reasonably well. 
--before I get to the other zones just to say a brief word about active recovery rides, and endurance rides. Based on my previous posts in the past, you probably could guess that I'm not a huge fan of these super long monotonous low intensity type workouts. Even when I was only running I wasn't a fan of the classic LSD run (long slow distance) which was popularized in the 1970s during the running boom, and still a high percentage of runners incorporate LSD runs as a weekly staple in their marathon build. Even though the fact is they aren't that effective physiologically, and for elite runners especially those who already have a huge mileage base and aerobic base there are pretty much a waste of time. For years East African runners have been doing long hard runs instead, and since Abebe Bikila won gold in the Olympics in Rome 1960, the East Africans have dominated the sport. The way I've always looked at it is if I'm out here running for 2.5 hours or riding for 4 hours I may as well get some good quality work in. Essentially, I like to focus on quality, rather than slow, monotonous quantity. I think my aerobic base is pretty substantial, so I don't think riding for 5 hours in zone 1 is going to do much for me. 

3. Tempo (76-90%): this is kind of a middle zone. You can maintain this intensity for a long period of time, but it does require a fair amount of concentration to maintain especially when your in the upper end of this zone (88% is very different then 76%). For the long course triathletes out there your Tempo Power is a  realistic range to be within for the entire bike leg. For 70.3 distance the general guideline is between 80-85% of FTP, and for full ironman 70-75% depending on experience. Beginners could be conservative and make their goal the lower end of those ranges, and then see how well they are able to run off the bike. For some people there may be able to run well off higher for 70.3s say 85-90%. Because this type of power is quite sustainable, tempo "intervals" are usually very long. I say intervals with quotations because for me a tempo ride might be anywhere from 1.5 to 2.5 hours long of straight continuous power at say 80% FTP, so I don't really consider them true intervals. But you could make these tempo type workouts slightly more enjoyable and make the time pass quicker by having say 10-15 minute blocks of power at various percentages all within the tempo zone. So for example you could do a workout of 60 minutes continuous tempo riding with 15 minutes at 80%, 15 minutes 83%, 15 minutes 85%, 15 minutes 80%. Or even staying within that tempo zone of power but breaking the time up with cadence variations. So for instance 15 minutes at normal cadence, 15 minutes 3-5 RPM higher than normal cadence, 15 minutes 10 RPM lower than normal cadence, and then the final 15 minutes at whichever of the two (higher or lower) was more challenging. Besides the aerobic benefits of tempo zone riding, it helps you to get accustomed to producing a fair amount of power for a prolonged period of time. You can use tempo rides closer to the race to mimic what the goal race power will feel like, or to fine tune what percentage of that zone you are able to run well off of in brick training. I like to do a lot of my brick runs off tempo power workouts. I think it more closely replicates the feeling in the race since that will be the power I'm targeting, compared to doing a brick run off of say 10x3 minute VO2 max intervals. If the goal of the workout is to hurt, sure go ahead and run off some insanely difficult bike workouts, but if the goal of the workout is to simulate what you can expect to feel on race day (and add those memories to your mental training folder) than brick runs off tempo power is the way to go in my opinion. Really with any swim/bike/run workout it is crucial that before the workout you are able to answer the simple question of what is the goal/purpose of this workout (how is this going to benefit me on race day).

4. Lactate Threshold (91-105% FTP): Work done in this zone is intense. You can't maintain conversation anymore, and it requires full concentration to maintain the target power. Efforts can still be relatively long anywhere from 8-30 minutes (if on the low end of the zone - more on this is just a bit**). The goal of intervals done at or just above the lactate threshold is pretty self-explanatory: increase lactate threshold. The power at lactate threshold is probably the most important determinant of performance for endurance cycling. Going just above your threshold (101-105%) is going to help push your FTP (threshold) higher and therefore you will become faster. Also by riding only slightly above your FTP you'll become both physically and mentally accustomed to a workload just beyond your current capabilities. With threshold riding my favourite workout has to be over-unders. Over-unders can be anywhere from 6-15 minutes long and alternate between going from about 95% FTP to 105% (essentially going just over, and then "recovering" just under your lactate threshold). So you can ride for say 2 minutes at 95% FTP, then 1 minute at 105%, then back to 2 minutes at 95%, and then back to 105% for one minute and so fourth. This type of workout has so many benefits. Firstly, physiologically you improve at how quickly you are able to clear lactate, and "ride off the burn" while still being at quite a high intensity. Also mentally, over-unders make you into a tougher rider, since it's that first 20 seconds or so after the over period at 105% when you just want to back all the way off, except you need to work through that very uncomfortable feeling in your legs while still being at a very high power.

**Sweet Spot - this additional zone is really like zone 3.5. The power in this zone is between 88-92%, so between upper end Tempo, and low end threshold. Even though Coogan didn't formally include this zone in his 7, it may be one of the more beneficial zones. Essentially, you are able to get the same physiological and psychological effects of a threshold workout but because the intensity is just ever so slightly less you can do longer and more repetitions of intervals. And you can do these workouts more regularly since they require less recovery then true lactate threshold workouts like the over-under I explained. With sweet spot workouts you can make intervals 15, 20, 30 minutes or even longer. You can do workouts like 3x20 minutes at 90% or 2x30minutes at 90%, and you will get huge benefits increasing your aerobic capacity and FTP. 

5. VO2 max (106-120%): the last zone I will talk about in detail is the classic and sometimes dreaded VO2 max zone, which as the name suggests is for the purpose of increasing your VO2 max, or maximal aerobic capabilities - increase stroke volume and cardiac output, muscle capillarization, hypertrophy of slow twitch fibres, increased plasma volume, etc. Intervals can be anywhere from 3-8 minutes in length, but only the most experienced would be able to stay in this zone for 8 minutes. In this zone you will have severe leg discomfort, hard breathing, and fatigue, and the time accumulated in this zone would rarely be more than 20-30 minutes. Also, although VO2 max workouts are extremely effective and important physiologically they can only be done so often and with a good recovery before and afterwards (not on repeated days). Physiologically speaking one could actually only sustain VO2 max for 8-9 minutes therefore your not going to be doing something like 10x9 minutes intervals at VO2 max. A good effective VO2 max workout could be something like 4x5 minutes, or 5x4 minutes at 108% FTP. Something though that I did want to touch on with VO2 max workouts is how to properly design the workout when it comes to the rest between intervals. From rest it takes our bodies approximately 2 minutes to get to VO2 max, therefore when you design a workout it will not be true VO2 max workout if you do say 10x2 minutes with 5 minutes recovery between each. The 5 minutes of recovery will be enough for you to get back down to baseline, and the 2 minutes will not be long enough to ramp your aerobic system up to its maximum. That being said could a VO2 max workout use 2 minute intervals. Absolutely, however, the rest between each needs to be short enough that you are unable to get back down to baseline. So you could do that same 10x2minutes but only 1 minute recovery between each, and then since you are not able aerobically to get back down to baseline you will be starting from a higher intensity at the start of the next interval and therefore able to actually reach VO2 max. Again going back to what I said previously, you need to ask yourself what is the purpose of the workout. If the goal of the workout is just to repeatedly hold a power which lies within your VO2 max zone for 1 minute at a time then sure do 10x1 minute at that power with a full 10 minutes of recovery in between each, but understand that you will not be actually touching your maximal aerobic capabilities. For that the interval needs to be about 3 minutes long to ramp up to your aerobic capacity, or that same short interval of 1-2 minutes can be used but with a very short recoveries in between each.

6. Anaerobic Capacity (greater than 121% FTP): short intervals 30s to 3 minutes to increase anaerobic (sprint) power - which is why I'm not going to go into detail on them since then aren't really important for long course triathletes

7. Neuromuscular power: super short 5-15 second out of the saddle sprints not designed to get after any metabolic gains, but more to just increase musculoskeletal power (again not big advantage for long course triathlon).

So there you have it all the training zone explained with some workout examples. In the next post, which will be the final part 3 of indoor training, I will put it all together to help you come up with a good structured training plan for your bike training. I hope you found this helpful, I compiled all this information from about 15 different sources the main one's being Andrew Coogan and Hunter Allen's Book: Training with Power, Joe Friel's Training Bible, TrainerRoad, and Jack Daniel's Running Formula 3rd Edition, along with my own exercise science background, and experiences. 

Sunday, February 12, 2017

Thoughts on Indoor Training

Indoor Training

Years ago you could maybe count on one hand how many people you knew who trained either exclusively or did the majority of their training, whether it was running or cycling, indoors. Nowadays it seems that everyone is converting to indoor training, or at least incorporating it into their regular training regimen in some way. It used to be that indoor training was pretty much reserved for those of us living in cold climates to get into some quality training runs in on the treadmill, or for cyclists trying to stay in good shape through the winter by spending long hours on the bike while getting to watch some tv at the same time (a point I'll touch on later). Now however, we are seeing many athletes, including myself, not just hold a spot in our training regimen to be indoors throughout the winter, but also year-round. I think the shift in the training methods stems from a couple different factors.

Firstly, indoor training has become more fun and engaging. It used to be that when the snow started to come down and cover the streets, cyclists would either stop training until the spring, or would grab there bikes and take them out into the garage or the dark dungeon of a basement fix their bike to the trainer, and go at it suffering in absolute boredom for hours on end. Now we have all sorts of different gadgets and software tools to help the time fly by and actually use this "offseason" time to make huge gains on the bike. We have smart trainers like the Wahoo Kickr (http://www.wahoofitness.com?acc=a532400ed62e772b9dc0b8 6f46e583ff) which can do a number of fun and interesting things. The trainer can simulate climbs up to 20%, simulate downhills since the flywheel is so heavy (5kg) if you stop pedalling the wheel keeps spinning giving an incredibly realistic road feel, and it is compatible with numerous different online platforms like Zwift and TrainerRoad which can help you become a faster, stronger cyclist. Zwift (http://zwift.com/) is an interactive online world where you bike around an island and your smart trainer will automatically simulate all the climbs and downhills to making it incredibly engaging and rewarding. Basically what I mean by simulates climbs and downhills, for those who don't know how the trainer or Zwift works, is that in Zwift when your
Riding on Zwift - normally in the top left corner
are you stats like Time, Power, Heart rate, cadence
hill gradient, speed, etc. 
character on the screen gets to a hill the trainer automatically adjusts the resistance making it harder to pedal and the amount of resistance depends on the gradient of the hill. If your going downhill, the trainer lowers the resistance accordingly, and you can gear up to blast it down the hill. In terms of it being interactive, everyone who has Zwift is riding on the same Island so you have thousands of cyclists able to interact with you as you play. And it is not just merely everyone is separate doing their own thing on the island, the software has been developed so that when you are behind another cyclist you benefit from the effects of drafting, and their are always races or group rides that you can join (your speed is determined by the terrain your on and then a combination of your power (wattage) and body weight (W/kg)). The game is also linked into Strava so there are KOM's and segments where you can compare your best times to everyone around the world. It will be tough though to get some of those KOM's as there are many professional cyclists who use Zwift on a regular basis.

TrainerRoad (https://www.trainerroad.com/) on the other hand I find just as engaging as Zwift but a little more serious (I use both). Yes in Zwift races can be very intense, and they also now have workout mode where you can select from a number of workouts, but TrainerRoad is a training tool where you can either select a training plan that gives you daily workouts to complete or you can pick and choose workouts selectively without being in a plan, and as you complete the workouts instead of the screen being a character riding around a bright and beautiful island, on the screen is just a lot of graphs and numbers telling you heart rate, power, time left in interval, speed, overall time, power variability, etc. How TrainerRoad works is first you complete an FTP test, and then lets say in your plan you are to complete an interval workout of 5x10 minutes at 90% FTP w/ 3 minute recoveries at 50% FTP. If your FTP is 300W then the 90% is 270W and the 50% for the recoveries is 150W. In trainerRoad, there is something called Erg Mode which basically automatically sets the resistance on the trainer to keep your power at a certain number no matter what the cadence is, therefore you never have to change gears. What that means is you can spin at 60RPM and the trainer will boost up the resistance to keep the power at 270W and when you speed up the cadence to say 100RPM the trainer will lower the resistance slightly but still have enough to keep you at 270W. So basically during the interval you don't really have to think to much about what gear your in or keeping your cadence at a certain number to maintain your power, the trainer will do that for you. No matter what it will keep you at 270W unless of course is gets to hard and then you can't pedal anymore and need to stop. On the 50% or 150W recoveries the trainer will lower down the resistance automatically, and you recover at whatever cadence you like, again the trainer keeps you 150W regardless. In addition to having over 1000 different workouts to choose from, the training plans are extremely effective and there a numerous available to be specific to exactly what you training for from Sprint Triathlon to Full Ironman, short steep climbs for mountain biking, cyclocross, hilly grand fondos, criteriums, 40 k TT, etc. The plans are also nicely periodized into a base phase, build phase, and speciality phase.

In addition you can use these smart trainers to simulate exactly the race course you intend on racing to help you with those test sets prior to a race. You can do this by using online tools like Best Bike Split (https://bestbikesplit.com/). Basically here's what you do (it is quite brilliant):

  1. Make an account on Best Bike Split 
  2. Go to "My Bikes" and input all the information on your bike (the make, geometry, fit, components, wheels, hydration setup, etc) 
  3. Go to "My Profile" input you FTP, max heart rate, experience, height, weight
  4. Go to "My Courses" and search for the race course that you are doing, they have most, if not you could just create one; so for instance I can look up Wisconsin Ironman 70.3 
  5. Then in "My Races" add the course, and the predicted weather conditions, and the tool will work out based on your FTP, riding position, weather, road surface, and the course profile the estimated time and your average and normalized power for that time. If you want a specific time you input that and the software will work out the power needed for all the segments on the course and give you all this information in a nice graph. For example for Wisconsin it may say for a 2:13 90k bike split up Observatory Hill I need to average 310 W, and then 250W on following downhill etc. 
  6. Then now this is pretty brilliant, what you can do is two things with this information: either you can take their proposed power plan file for the course needed to achieve your goal time save it and load it into TrainerRoad where you can now essentially ride the course at your goal power indoors to prepare, or you can upload the power plan file to your garmin and during the race have your target power number for whatever segment of the route you are on live on the screen with your current power making sure you stay on power and can achieve your goal time. Essentially it will give up live power instructions during the race. 
Miami Prediction with new improved FTP, under this
Best Bike Split has the power for all the segments
the graph shows the power plan for the race. 
Now some of you may be wondering well how accurate really is Best Bike Split at predicting my time and the power needed to achieve that time for whatever the course is. Well the software was not developed by some triathlete or cyclist like myself just wanting a better way to be able to pace myself on the bike. Instead it was developed by a PhD Mathematician, Ryan Cooper, who came up with this super complicated algorithm late one night prior to a time trial in the Tour de France which correctly predicted something like the first 10 riders times, including Chris Froome and Tony Martin, to within seconds over a 36km stage. It has of course been refined and perfected since then so it is incredibly accurate. In Barrelman this year it predicted my bike split to within 12 seconds, and in Miami to within 22 seconds (when I had only estimated the temperature and wind speed 2 weeks prior, had I used the forecast from the day before it would have been bang on - but still 12 or 22 seconds over a 90km bike ride (and remember in Miami I had also took a wrong turn at one point which cost me some time) is pretty amazing).

So that was all my first reason for why indoor training is becoming more popular - lol sorry about that rambled on for quite a while there. The second reason why I think indoor training throughout the year is becoming more popular is because well quite frankly biking outside can be downright dangerous with all the idiot drivers out on the road. Not only do I not trust any driver out there enough to put my head down and blast it at 45 km/hr on a city street with traffic, but the fact is that with the insane level of development in the GTA and York Region there are very few places where you can go without encountering a traffic light every few hundred meters. Therefore, it is almost impossible to do effective workouts outside anyway. Think about it, your out there doing a VO2 max workout where you are really going to challenge your aerobic system by biking at 125% FTP for 3 minutes. The challenge is not hitting 125% FTP, that part of the workout is pretty easy, but the challenge really is maintaining 125% FTP over 3 minutes, 3 minutes where your heart rate is going to go up and up and up until getting close to your max heart rate. So your out there ripping through the first minute at 125% FTP and heart rate is steadily climbing, and boom, red light, you have to stop, heart rate drops back to resting, and that's pretty much the end of that interval. No point finishing out the other 2 minutes, the workout was supposed to be 3 minutes. 2 minutes at that wattage won't be enough time to get the aerobic system churning at full gas.

So to sum it up, indoor training is safer, more effective in my opinion, and becoming more and more interactive and engaging. For me, last year I did probably 98% of my riding indoors. However, having said that, I do think outdoor riding still has it's place. First off, I think it is important to still have some of that road feel outside in terms of being confident in your aero-tuck position, and also handling of the bike on turns and downhills (and being confident enough to be aggressive going downhill). On the trainer, you can sometimes get pretty lazy regarding your core activation since you don't need to balance the bike at all, it isn't moving anywhere fixed to the trainer. It was always funny last year when if I went for a long of a period of time without going outside, that first time outside, the first minute or so, you would feel a little wobbly on the bike. It would come back within a minute, but still wouldn't want to train 100% indoors and then arrive at the race without having been outside on the bike in months. Second, while I believe you are able to work on your aero-tuck position indoors, it still always feels slightly different outside. So go out once and a while and practice staying in your tuck for extended periods of time to get used to that feeling for race day. Third, bike skills like taking in your nutrition need to be practiced outside on the road. It is great on the trainer having your three or four bottles surrounding you well within reach, but outside it is different. If your like me and have a bottle up between your arms in the aerobars, and a bottle behind the saddle (the most aerodynamic spot hidden from the wind), you need to practice reaching behind you to grab that bottle. I didn't take my own advice in this case, as just before Miami I purchased a behind the seat mounted bottle, and was not able to get used to reaching behind me to grab that bottle in such a short period of time. The flexibility to do it and the balance required was just not something I had worked on and when I got to Miami, I was able to take the bottle out of the cage, but in the race I couldn't put it back in (it was a very tight fit with my bottle I was using + the bottle cage has 14 lbs of grip) so I had to just fill my front bottle with the rear one, and then toss the rear bottle (a 12.99$ bottle wasted; it was at the aid station so wasn't littering). Lastly, outdoor still has it place for extremely long rides. Yes I have done 4.5-5 hour rides on Zwift and TrainerRoad before inside. How? Takes a lot of mental fortitude, and an amazing music playlist. I think on some of those rides my Dad probably started to think the music was on random since I think I started with electronic dance/house music (my favourite training music), then changed to latin party anthems like Daddy Yankee, and Don Omar, then went to ACDC, then some old-school Blink-182, then some CCR, back to electric music, and so on. But seriously, I think it is possible to do very long rides inside, however, why not keep indoor rides slightly shorter, and more intense to get the most bang for your buck, and save the super long rides for outside where you can work on being in your aero position, find some new roads, and practice hydrating on the go. That brings me back to my point from earlier where you hear about people doing 5-6 hour long rides in front of the tv watching netflix. Personally I think my aerobic base is pretty darn good after years of pushing my body to the limit, so I really doubt spending 6 hours on the trainer watching Suits episodes where my heart rate doesn't go above 110 is really going to benefit me in any way. Indoors I like to keep my rides under 3 hours for long rides, but within those 3 hours there is a tonne of high intensity work. 

Some Final Tips to maximize your Indoor Training:
http://www.wahoofitness.com?acc=a532400ed62e772b9dc0b8 6f46e583ff
Go to Wahoo Fitness for more information on differen trainers,
they have the direct one shown here, and a cheaper but still
incredibly high-quality wheel-on model. 

  1. Buy a good fan. Unlike when you are outside, inside the air around you is not moving, so you can overheat very quickly without a fan, and your performance will suffer.
  2. Related to the first stay hydrated (and make note of your weight before and after rides to see how you are performing with your hydration) 
  3. Invest in a decent sound system, and start compiling a good music playlist. 
  4. Use a smart trainer like the Wahoo Kickr to be able to take advantage of all the online training tools available nowadays. 
  5. Don't neglect your position on the bike. I like to always incorporate some drills to work on my position into my workouts. For example, lifting one hand off the handlebars and seeing to it that your body position doesn't change at all, holding that position for 30 seconds, and then switching hands. Or another could be making sure your "sit" bones are anchored to the wings of the saddle, and pelvis is not tilted forward. Indoors is also the perfect place to work of pedalling technique (kicking your toes over the top 10-2 o'clock position, and then pulling across the bottom 4-8 o'clock position). 
  6. A safety tip from inside from someone who really knows it (trust me): When you are done the workout, do not linger, take the shorts off, shower and get on with the day. After a few hours sweating buckets in a pair of bike shorts, the chamois essentially becomes a petri dish for bacteria, fungus, and yeast to thrive (sorry this is so bluntly put but it needs to be said). Get the shorts off and shower, and do not, I repeat DO NOT, wear the same shorts twice. I am famous for talking too much (look at this post it was supposed to be short and sweet and here I am still writing). In elementary school and high school I spent pretty much everyday after school in the office because I was talking too much in class - many times where my parents had to be called in to the school and told by the teacher that "Frank just won't stop chatting to other students during the lesson." However, after I'm done a training session it is not the time to chat to people about how good of a workout it was (or bad), or when Tiger Woods is finally going to be healthy (come on man I'm rooting for you). Go upstairs and shower. How do I know what I'm talking about well I'll tell you, it's embarrassing but I'm open on this blog, last year in October I got an absolutely horrible infection in my groin area (from sweaty bike shorts) and it actually kept me from running for just short of a week, and when I did manage to get my run in it literally felt like I was running with shards of glass in my shorts. I also couldn't sleep at night for about two weeks because I was in so much pain and so damn itchy. Anyways, my point is don't linger finish the workout and move on. 
  7. Finally, have fun. Indoor training as I think I've explained is a great way to not only stay in shape, but also improve your fitness during the winter and also year-round, so give it a try.
In my next post, I will talk about the variety of different bike workouts I like to do, and some tips on using heart rate data to it's fullest.

Saturday, January 28, 2017

Training Update: Running Zones

Currently, I'm 4 weeks into my second 5 week big block of training before a nice recovery-type week, and boy am I feeling fit averaging roughly 27-28 hours of training per week. The second block has definitely had more of a run emphasis taking up a bigger % of my training time since after my recovery week where the mileage was at 62km, the weeks following I have run 69, 77, 79, and this week will be 80. I am feeling better and better about my running, and my strategy that I employed early in the last block has been paying off well so far. Basically when the mileage was only at 50km or so early in the last block, I said to myself that with the mileage being so low, relative to what I was used to, it would be silly to split the 50 or so kilometres up between 6 or 7 runs**.

**In the past I would usually do 6 runs per week with one recovery day in there, unless I was into bigger mileage where I may have run all 7 days. Though, even my biggest 200+km and 230km running training weeks back in 2013, I was usually taking 1 day off per week.

I thought splitting 50km up between 6 days would be useless since it would mean running only 8 or so kilometers per day and I figured that roughly 30 minutes of running wouldn't be enough to really even get a true aerobic benefit - plus running less than double digits just didn't sound good. So I decided to split it up between 5 days. Throughout that training block, my tibia was still hurting on most days, but gradually I noticed even though I was now running more in a single session because it was 6 runs worth divided up between only 5 runs, having two off running days during the week gave the tibia more time to recover between the runs and it felt better and better as the block progressed. So the schedule would look like this: 

Mon-Run
Tues- Run 
Wed - OFF
Thurs - Run
Fri - Run 
Sat - OFF
Sun - Run off the bike 

On the OFF days of running I would simply devote more time to do a longer more intense bike sessions which I find has also helped me progress since it makes the other days sessions feels that much shorter and I can ramp the intensity even higher. As a result my biking has continued to see massive improvements holding power numbers I never would have imagined before. For example, a couple weeks ago, I remember my Dad coming downstairs and we starting chatting as I was on the bike, and I remarked to him that only a year before, the wattage that I was currently pedalling at was my FTP (threshold) and it was that 20 minute test that left me crying like a baby afterwards, and now here I was easily holding a discussion with him at that same wattage. 

In addition to my biking getting better as a result of the extra day off, my running has improved dramatically. After the OFF day I feel like a new runner with brand new joints and bones, and my tibia hasn't been a major issue since. Yes it still has its days where it is painful, but not close to same degree or as regularly as it was earlier where every step I took was incredibly painful, and was enough to bring me to tears or a complete stop on some runs. My average pace on normal runs is way quicker than it was leading up to Miami, where every single run now is right around 4:00/km if not quicker, and my brick workouts have all had average paces into the 3:40s, and 3:30s. Just yesterday I was thinking to myself on my way home from an awesome swim workout that my running is feeling very similar to where it was at the beginning of 2013 where every single run was pretty quick and around this pace exactly. It's interesting because what I was doing in 2013 and am doing now is very different from what many books or training plans prescribe called a polarized training. Many prescribe that easy pace needs to be very easy, and when you go hard you go gut-wrenching hard. Throughout a program the typical training schedule would be broken up into very hard workout, very easy run, very hard workout, very easy run, and so fourth. Right now I am mostly training in the middle between the two extremes. I am not doing any true interval type workouts yet of say 1km repeats or mile repeats or 400s or whatever at roughly 3:00/km pace, but I am not going out and jogging around at 4:30 or 5 minute pace either. I am training in this middle area that some say useless because your not tapping into the true speed zone, but still going fast enough that your not really giving muscles a break either. However in 2013 this is where I spent the majority of my training time, and I went on to run for 11 months without a single major injury, raced regularly from February all the way to November, PB'ed every single distance, ran 5 half-marathons, 1 30km, a 10km in 32 minutes in the middle of a 160 km week, and a 2:34 marathon. Suffice to say it was an extremely successful year of running, and therefore I believe it is naive to think that this middle zone has no benefit. Aerobically you are working in the lower end of your "tempo zone" so your gradually growing your aerobic power, and your muscles/tendons are getting a good workout without going overboard and killing them. I also believe physiologically/structurally it is much easier to go from this type of running intensity into those more speedy workouts than to go from the classic base phase running intensity that running programs prescribe - long and very slow runs. To me it makes no sense that a runner can aerobically go from running 5:00/km pace daily for months to running 3:10 kilometre repeats. Just think about it from a heart rate perspective. If I go out and train for 2 months at 5:00/km pace and my heart rate never goes above 120 how on earth am I building my aerobic power to be able to handle my heart rate being high 180s, low 190s for interval repeats. At 120 bpm, am I stressing the system any way to force it to adapt, no of course not. Okay now take it one step further and look at it from a structural point of view. People say base phase is necessary to build up musculotendinous strength. But if we were to measure the power going through the achilles tendon at 5:00/km pace would it be comparable to the power at 3:10/km pace, heck no. So how would that minimal stress than prepare the tendon to take on the maximal stress of intervals. A different perspective if it makes more sense to you, how would riding for 2 months at 150W for countless hours prepare your legs to then go at 400W for multiple interval repeats. I believe that this middle zone is a far too neglected training zone because I believe as I mentioned you get both a true aerobic benefit and musculoskeletal benefit to prepare yourself for true speed work, without burying yourself.

Now, you may be saying to yourself, wait a minute this is a guy who has struggled mightily with both macrotraumatic injuries like two torn hip flexors, and microtraumatic injuries like numerous tibial stress fractures on and off for the last couple years. The fact is that the last couple years I believe it is because I slowly let my training drift into this extremely polarized type of training that caused me to get injured more frequently. Which is why I'm going back to training in this middle zone more regularly like I did in 2013 where I was seemingly indestructible. Why did my training shift away from the way I did in 2013. Well this may sound odd and counterintuitive, but I believe it was because I started doing a lot more research on training philosophies and workout regimens whether from numerous running videos that I would watch, or books that I started to read. I think I became so consumed with finding the perfect training regimen (or the so-called secret to getting to that next level) as employed by the world's best coaches, that I forgot about what seemed to work well for me, and my own theories. Having said all this, am I saying throw the slow recovery run out the window, no. It has its place every so often in a running schedule when say a day comes along where you are feeling a little sore or you had a number of big days in a row but you want to just "spin" the legs out so to speak. However, as a triathlete now, I am starting to realize with such a huge percentage of time taken up on the bike and in the pool you can't really afford to have numerous runs a week of garbage mileage (this very very ease pace or recovery runs).   

So now, back to the training, for the last couple weeks now that the mileage is getting to higher levels the run schedule has been more like 15 km run, 20 km run, off, 15 km run, 19 km, off, 10 km off 2 hr + bike. Even though eventually at some point once the mileage gets to say the 130s, 140s if it ever does get there (or if I feel the need for it to get there - more on this later) I would likely have to go back to only one off day since the daily mileage would just be too high to be able to fit it quality biking and swimming to go along with the run session. For example in the 140s, if only split up between 5 days of running it would mean an average of 28 km per run session. That would mean approximately 2 hours right there, and if you add the bike and swim on top of that it is well over 5 hours of training per day (35 hours per week) which is more that the best triathletes in the world train in the heaviest parts of there season, and would be a sure fire way of burning out of getting injured.

The point about mileage getting into the 130s and 140s brings up a couple of thoughts. Just before I get into that though, why do I have this number of 130-140 and a benchmark for myself. Well because historically going back through years of training logs I have always ran my best half-marathons off of 130-140km weeks. However, now that in a race on-top of training for the run there is a 2-3km long open water swim, and a 90-120km bike ride, would I have the time to put in these types of weeks. Sure, they will be times throughout the year that I will probably be getting up to that mileage (especially before the world championships), but having said that I only want to get up to that type of mileage if it is mostly quality mileage. As I mentioned before, the recovery jogs, and garbage mileage is a waste of time that could be better spent refining technique in the pool, or aerodynamics on the bike. If I can only get up to stay at about 100-120km of high-quality mileage while continuing to getting stronger and better in the water and on the bike, so be it.

For now, I will continue to slowly build up my running in this middle zone, and when I feel ready to start putting some truly speedy stuff on top of it I will. But until then I know that the middle zone of training is helping me to progress, and get stronger, and keeping me healthy and injury free. 

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

2016 By the Numbers and What's Ahead for 2017

Well that was a crazy year. Many new experiences to learn from, many great performances, some painful injuries, and a whole lot of training. How much?

2016 - Overall Mileage and Time

Cycling:

16,751 km -- Avg of approx 325km/week 
523 hours 
360,000 Kcal 
FTP increased by 50 W 
I won't go too much into detail on my bike review for the year since I discussed that in my last post. Overall, I improved immensely on the bike, and did it all riding inside safely on my indoor trainer, compared to 2015 where I did all my mileage (as soon as it was nice enough outside to ride until the winter) outside.

Swimming: 


900 km 
I wasn't swimming regularly from January to April (only 1-2 swims on weekends) since at that point I was not training for triathlon specifically, swimming was only a means of cross training. After my injury in April the day after the Race Roster 8km, where I ran 25:55 for 7th Overall on a very hilly course, then my focus switched to triathlon to try to stop the cycle of injuries and try something different. So from that point (mid-April) to the end of the year I swam 825 out of the 900 kilometers which is an average of 23 per week (with one full week off after Miami in November).
288 Hours 
160,000 Kcal 
Under Sheryl's Guidance my swim speed (including drills, kicking, and recovery swims) increased from approximately 3.6 km/hr, to 4.2 km/hr -- approximately a 17% improvement


Running 

As I just mentioned my running mileage for the majority of the year was significantly reduced due to injury. I started off the year well averaging 135 km per week from Jan 1st to the Race in April. During that time period (Jan 1st to April 9th) I ran 1750 km out of the Total of 3400 km for the entire year. 
After that injury, which bothered me throughout the entire year, my running was extremely inconsistent, in May for example I couldn't run at all (managed a whole 19km for that month which were made up of a couple times throughout that month testing out the leg if it was better or not - which it wasn't), and in July ran a grand total of 40km. Running in August was decent again, doing 344km (86 per week), in September got hit with another injury/flare up of the one from April which took me down to 200km, and then in October running was half-decent again doing 402 km (100km/week).
Total Time 247 hours 
200,000 kcal 
I had taken two weeks off right after the race in November, and since then I have been trying to be very smart about my running. My first week back I ran 41km and then have been increasing by 10% each week. So the next week was 45.7, the next was 50.1, 55.8, 61.6, and on track for 67 this week. So far it is going pretty well. I can still feel a stress fracture that I ran on for all of September, October, and November, but it is not horrible. Some days are really good where I feel it only at the beginning of the run, others it lingers throughout but it doesn't seem to be hampering my stride, and it is getting better I think each week. I have been noticeable faster so far in the last month or so of running than I was all of last year, with most runs at 4:00 min/km, and some into the high 3:50s and just last Sunday averaged 3:45/km easily right after a 2 hour workout on the bike. I am being more intelligent and have been giving more thought to my strength training which I feel has really improved my stride, and posture as I run. Overall, with the help of my new focus on specific strength training I feel much more powerful running. Not that I wasn't doing strength/core training before (I have been doing it everyday for the last few years), but I have just made some tweaks to my regimen to make it more running specific. In terms of the gameplan for running going forwards, I am going to just keep building mileage by 10% each week until I get to around 80-90km without pain and then will start doing speed workouts again, hopefully starting them without any lingering injury, and with a strong foundation.

Strength Training 
137 Hours 

Grand Total: 
21,150 Kilometers; 1250 hours; Approximately 800,000 kcal
If you're wondering why I'm reporting kcal burned it's because I think it is a fun statistic when you look at from a couple different perspectives. For example, physiologically 800,000 kcal is equivalent to 230 pounds of fat/energy in our bodies. Another way to look at it 800,000 kcal is equivalent to 1600 Big Mac's from McDonalds. Meaning on an average day in 2016 just through exercise (not counting my basal metabolic rate [what you burn without doing anything]) I burned about 4.4 Big Mac's. For distance that is more than half way around the planet! For swimming it is equivalent to 18 times across Lake Ontario!

Anyways so the game plan for training for 2017 is to work in 5-week build cycles. Meaning I will train hard for 5 weeks and then week 6 will be a recovery week where I will train about half to 2/3's the volume of the hard work weeks. In the season, as the times and intensity continues to build 5 weeks hard before a recovery week will probably be too hard to sustain without either burnout or injury so I may switch to a 4 week build cycle then recovery week, or perhaps 3 week build then recover. The 3 or 4 week build cycles will probably be necessary during the meat of the race season so I can have 3 good training weeks then recover and race on the fourth week. In terms of racing, in the spring I will be doing a few road running races to regain my speed and get back to being confident in my running ability, and then Ironman 70.3 Wisconsin on June 11th will be my first big one of the season. Assuming everything continues to go well the rest of the triathlon season will look like this:
Rose City Long Course Triathlon June 25
- Ironman Racine July 16 
- Kingston Long Course Triathlon August 6
- ITU Long Distance World Championships Aug 27** 
- Ironman 70.3 World Championships (Chattanooga, TN) Sept 9 (assuming I've qualified by that point) 
- Ironman 70.3 Miami Oct 22 

**The World Championships in Penticton is for sure the main focus for the year. Going to be a big day with a 3km swim, 120 km bike, and 30 km run, but I'm excited for it. 

Of course the main goal of the year is stay healthy, stay healthy, stay healthy. I can't repeat this enough. Be smart, do not get too excited, and if an injury does happen, be even smarter and take recovery seriously. 

Happy New Year all, and happy training. 

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

The Offseason: Bike Training Changes

I'm starting to learn that in the sport of triathlon there really is no offseason. Yes the training volume is slightly reduced compared to what it was in August for example, but in reality when you have to compete in three very different sports on a single day of competition, training is time consuming. Not only from a perspective of the hours spent on day-to-day basis but also in terms of the length of time it takes to build for a race because of all the intricacies that make up the triathlon. Take a half ironman for example, first you need to train to be able to complete a 2km open water swim. Swimming, I find atleast, is an extremely technique-based sport, and one that relies heavily on rhythm. For a person who doesn't come from a swim background, other than going through the swimming lesson levels but no club swimming or anything, it would be difficult for me to take a while off swimming and then just jump back in the water and start ripping off some fast intervals. In fact, I took a complete 4 days off swimming after the race in Miami, and then on Friday swam, and it was probably one of my worst feeling swims of the year. My stroke felt terrible, I felt like I was sinking in the water, and was completely out of rhythm - and that was after only 4 days! So swimming takes a lot of time for anyone since its so technical, and then needing to build the endurance and speed to hold a fast pace for 2km of non-stop swimming, with sighting along the way to even see where you're going. For the bike, you need to train to be able to complete a 90 km bike ride and in this training your needing to train to be able to hold a high power start to finish for a little more than two hours if your going for the top of the podium (for a pretty decent cyclist it will take around 3 hours if not more), in addition to being able to keep your body in the most aerodynamic position possible for that duration of time. For someone who isn't used to being in aerobars on a time trial bike, I would say they may only last a minute before the pain/discomfort in their neck, shoulder, arms, and back become to much to handle. So being able to hold this position is something you need to practice and gradually build up. You also need to train to be able to handle the conditions like getting used to biking in a crosswind with deep section wheels, and the course itself such as training to be able to climb a 10km long hill and not letting up after cresting the top. And then the run. A half-marathon. Most half-marathon builds are anywhere from 12, if your experienced, to 18 weeks. This time however you will be running after 90km on the bike, which means you need to train to be able to handle the heavy, "brick" like feeling in your legs starting the run coming off the bike, and find your rhythm as quickly as possible. Then are the "soft" skills of triathlon such as transitions from swim to bike (getting the wetsuit off and mounting the bike quickly) and then bike to run (dismounted, putting on shoes, race belt, etc), which could make or break your race if your going for the podium - which it did for me this year in Orillia where I finished third despite having a faster bike and run then 2nd place since I was slower in transition. On top of all these skills, your doing all of this in one day from one event to the next, meaning you need to practice your fueling and hydration to be able to even make it to the finish line. Basically what I'm saying is that it takes a lot of time to train to complete a half-ironman and even more if your trying to win it. But like I said at the beginning of the post this time of the year where you are doing marginally less training than mid-season, so it is the time to use the extra moments to reflect on the year, and think about all these factors that make up a race, and what you can improve on.

For me, the first thing I am evaluating (and have been for the last week) is my bike. What can I do to make it better? My bike improved hugely this season, and it turned into one of my bigger weapons in races. My FTP (functional threshold power - the power you can hold for 1 hour) went up hugely at the beginning of the year, and then continued to go up till around half-way through the year, at which point I was pretty content with where my FTP and was now in the thick of racing season, so I stuck to workouts that would allow me essentially to maintain my FTP for the remainder of the year. Because I was racing so regularly I didn't feel I had enough time throughout some weeks between recovering just after a race, then training regularly, and then recovering again before the next race to really push my upper limits deeper into the season. Really I comes down to the fact that I don't think I periodized my racing well enough. In the coming season I would like to organize my race schedule a little better so that I can actually improve from race to race instead of just hitting my fitness level early on in the year and then plateauing. Also, after my FTP test, I never actually spent very much time at my FTP, and seemed to really struggle with workouts with intervals above 120%. Although for half-ironman racing you are obviously not working at your FTP (since that's power you could theoretically only hold for 1 hour), if you improved your threshold power and kept the percentage of that power the same you would improve, or similarly if you were to improve your FTP but keep your target race wattage the same the relative intensity factor (%FTP) would be lower which would mean that you could run off the bike better.

That was pretty wordy so let me put some numbers to that to explain what I mean. Say for example right now my 20 minute FTP test yielded a value of 305W giving me an FTP of 290W (after multiplying 305*0.95). If during Miami I was intending on holding 245W that means my goal power was 0.85 or 85% of my threshold. 0.85 is at about the upper end of where you can run decently well off the bike (given good hydration levels - which I did not have in Miami, hence my run performance). If I were to push harder throughout the year and improved my FTP to say 310W then if I still wanted to hold 245 W since I maybe had good experiences in previous races running off that type of power than 245W would be only 0.79 or 79%, and this would be around the %FTP a beginner triathlete would be able to run very well off the bike. If however, my goal was still to push myself as hard as I could and straddle the line to going overboard and not being able to run as well off the bike (but maybe now have more time in the bank from the bike) I could still push at 85% of my threshold which would now be 264W, and that would mean a significantly faster bike time. According to best bike split with the same IF of 0.85 but FTP of 310 instead of 290W the bike split would be an entire 3 minutes faster on the MiamiMan course. Anyways the point is I will be working hard to bump up my FTP to as high as I can so that I can perform better by either have race pace feel easier since its at a relatively lower intensity and therefore running better off the bike, or the pro choice: pushing a higher power on the bike at the same relative intensity and just getting better at running off the bike by practicing it more.

To accomplish this goal I will be doing more workouts with intervals at or above 120% FTP to improve the FTP. All season I really struggled with VO2 max type intervals around 3 minutes in length and above 120%, which I will work hard to improve since it will lead to improvements in my threshold. I also would like to work hard on trying to improve my 5 minute power. You might say why your five minute power if the bike is over 2 hours in length. Well because there are points in race where you may need to hold a high power for about 5 minutes to surge ahead of a competitor and stay ahead for good. For example, in Miami, I caught the second place guy at around the 13 mile marker, passed him, only to stay ahead for a few minutes before he went ahead of me, and then I had to put in another big effort to get ahead of him again. Point is, I had to two times the work to get ahead of one guy, when if I was able to put a big 5 minute surge in, it would be done with there and then. How I know my 5 minute is lacking is that currently my 20 minute power of 5.71 W/kg puts me into the Domestic Professional Cyclist Category (one category away from International Professional), and my 5 minute power is behind in a Category 1 Cyclist category. Mind you, I've never specifically done a 5 minute test, but there is a huge data pool of my rides to draw a 5 minute max power profile from. Lastly, after all this power talk I would like to improve my positioning on the bike, specifically my head position. I've looked at in the last 2 weeks pictures from world record holders, tour de france winners, and ironman professionals, and I've noticed that for almost all of them their eyes are in line with the belly of the deltoid muscle, and my eyes on the other hand are above the line of my shoulders making my position less aerodynamic. I think I'll just work have to work on general flexibility to achieve this, if needed I'll go for another bike fit to make some adjustments to get me even lower on the bike. However, I do think improved flexibility will be the answer since my bike has already been set up in a very aggressive position.

UPDATE: Just to update this post the last 1.5 weeks I've been riding very hard, and doing many supra threshold (above threshold) type intervals, and as of today improved my 20 minute power from 304W to 320W!!!

Thursday, November 17, 2016

Post MiamiMan Half Iron Race Report


As you know this past weekend I competed in my first ever half ironman. I knew going into this race it was going to be the biggest challenge I have ever taken on not only from the distance itself but also with the plethora of injuries I was carrying going into the race including the stress fracture in my right tibia which I had been running on for a couple months now, some widespread inflammatory issue that had been causing incredibly painful widespread stiffness in both my legs from the hips down, and then most recently out of the blue a left hamstring injury which I have been carrying since about Wednesday before the race - go figure. So yes I had a lot going through my head going into the race from a strategy point of view which I discussed in my last post, and many thoughts about what my already bruised and battered legs would feel like after a 90 km bike ride pushing a good amount of power. 


The race started at a 6:35am. Yes I did say 6:35am. This was pretty difficult to cope with from the start since it would mean I would be well out of my routine and even things like having a morning coffee would be difficult since no coffee shops or even room service would be open at 3:30am when I would have to wake up. But my dad did manage to get coffee at a bar that was still open -- and mentioned that he had to go through some pretty shady looking crowd to get it. After arriving at the race in complete darkness I was starting to wonder if the sun would even be up for the start of the race. Because the sun still wasn't up at about 6:20 we were unable to warmup in the water. The actual race course as you already know was two laps where you would have to get out of the water run around an arch with timing mat and run back in for a second lap. The most difficult part of the course though would be the opening 50 meters or so where you ran into the water and would have to make a sharp left turn around a bouy after only about 50 meters. So I lined up to the right, with the plan of taking it wide around the turn figuring I was one of the faster swimmers there, and would essentially be content swimming the extra little bit of distance if it meant I wouldn't get kicked, pulled, grabbed under, dolphin dived on top of, etc. Well it was decent plan but it is so funny how in these races people, who are not great swimmers and will finish ages after you, set off into that water like a grizzly whose spotted a school of salmon. They go ballistic the opening little bit at a torrid pace and fight, grab, kick, and pull anyone in their way. So ya it was a crazy start but within about 2 minutes I was out on my own and starting to get into my rhythm. The biggest problem was that the race was so early in the morning that there was a significant amount of fog (I'd say about 8ft high) above the water and not a word of a lie I couldn't see a thing. I would look up to sight but it really made no difference as I could only see about 50ft in front of me. What I ended up doing is catching up to the race leader and just sticking on their feet. I continued to sight just to see that I wasn't swerving all over the place, but really I was just hoping that the two of us would be able to figure the course out. Another swimmer caught up to us after a few minutes and now we had a good team of sighters. We came into the out for the first lap together and I slipped and fell pretty hard on the way back into the water as the rug/mat they had there had rolled up a little and I tripped on it. But I got up and just dove back in and got back on the leaders feet. There were a few points on the second lap where I thought I could leave this little group but I didn't want to risk leaving the group and having to rely solely on my own judgement/ability to see whether or not I was going the right way. The three of us exited the water together and cruised through the transition onto the bike nice and quickly, in fact it probably was one of my better swim to bike transitions of the year. 

Out onto the bike, I was cruising along at a good pace with a average power of 245 W for the first 25 minutes (bang on what I intended) and past someone who had gone past me in transition, and then there were the two left up ahead in my swim group. I made a big move past the first guy around mile 13 and then my best move of the day past the leader, and needed to sustain a pretty high power to stay clear of him (a 11 minute stretch at 265 W - about 4.7 W/kg). Going back a little, at about 15 minutes into the race I looked down at my arms and noticed a significant amount of moisture on them. At the time I thought this was water left over from the swim but after another 15 minutes when I noticed there was now more droplets on my arms I realized that it was sweat and that I was sweating significantly already. I kept the lead until about 23 miles when the leader from before surged past me. On the second of the two 15 miles laps we were now lapping people starting there first lap and let me tell you there was some crazy blatant drafting going on where there were huge groups literally organized into mini pelotons which was more annoying to me not because they were cheating since they were 15 miles behind me so no way they were catching up, but instead because it made passing them difficult since they were at times 5 wide across the road. My pace decreased significantly trying to get around people, but on one stretch were they were actually sticking to the right I averaged about 45 km/hr for a solid 5 minutes past hundreds of people, and got my pace back on track. At about 30 miles I made another big surge past the leader and was leading again. From about 35-40 miles I was absolutely ripping but the problem was that after only 1:30 into the race I had gone through all of my on-board hydration/nutitrion already, an amount I was intending on lasting until about the 2 hour mark. At the final bottle exchange point at about 43 miles, I grabbed a bottle and ended up missing the turn to the right to go back the 13 miles to the finish of the bike leg thanks to all the commotion at the bottle exchange tables. The wrong turn cost me an entire minute and the leader past me at this point. In my haste to try to catch back up as quickly as possible, I didn't manage to empty the bottle from the exchange zone completely (probably less than half) and ran out of fluid again quickly, and went without anything for approximately the last 10 miles of the bike. My legs began to cramp and the hamstring which was bugging me on Wednesday started to bug me once again, well probably more than just bug me, it was starting to downright hurt. With the lack of hydration and energy my speed and power began to quickly decrease and was passed by another competitor. I fought hard to maintain my second place passing this guy with about five miles to go in the bike but he overtook me again in the last bit. My speed and power continued to fall and was already feeling pretty ragged. I got off the bike in third place after a 2:13:22 90 km bike (40.5 km/hr average) but despite feeling dehydrated and drained from the heat, somehow managed to have the fastest bike to run transition I have ever had. 

I started out the run and despite feeling like garbage I managed to hold a pretty quick pace for the first few kilometres around 3:30/km, and by about the 1 mile mark caught the second place guy and passed him easily. The leader was now in my sights and about 50 meters or so ahead, and it would stay like this for the next 5 km or so. My pace stayed quite strong until around the 7-8km mark when the hamstring really started cramping and then my body was beginning to shutdown. I could feel the energy completely gone from my legs and the pace was dropping like a stone. I quickly lost sight of the leader and the mindset turned quickly from I'm going to win and go under 4 hours, since I was on pace for that at that point, to I desperately need to cool down and get as much fluid into me now to survive to the end. I was grabbing as much as I could at the aid stations taking up to 6 cups of fluid and carbohydrate drinks per station and a cup of ice which I poured down my shirt front and back. The heat became unbearable and there was no shade on the course for any relief. I thought about walking so many times but just kept moving, not quickly but just one foot in front of the other. I started the second lap and I was completely out of it, not really thinking anymore about the leader, and my hamstring would seize up whenever I tried to pick up and run a little quicker. I was pretty much running sideways to avoid extending that leg out and stretching the hamstring. Got a lot of encouragement by the volunteers at the aid stations, which I really appreciate, with people saying c'mon Frank you can do it just don't stop, and we're extremely helpful getting the ice and water and drinks to me and giving me gels. I was still in second but it was pretty obvious to the volunteers that I was in a world of hurt. I kept going and I have never been so emotional in the middle of a race. I was pretty much weeping in pain and a lack of energy and knowing how until 8k I was still on pace for 4 hours on the nose, and now I was seeing the clock on my watch get to 3:50 and 3:55 and 4 hours and still had a couple miles to go. The cramped up hamstring stopped me at one of the aid stations down to a shuffle and grabbed so many cups of fluid the volunteers were even impressed I was able to grab so many cups. I continued running along and saw the 1 mile to go. I dug deep to finish this one and rounded to final turn into the finishing chute. The clock read 4:16 I crossed the line and collapsed to the ground in a heap. Was there for a little while and then into the medical tent to get bags of ice out all over my back chest and under my arms. Really to be perfectly honest I wasn't thinking about much at this point. I was just so absolutely exhausted my mind couldn't even think about my time or place or how I felt. It took me a while to think about what I wanted to say about the race because after when I came to my senses I was so dissapointed with my run,1:31 for the half marathon, and the fact that I was on pace for a world class time until the 8 kilometre mark in the run. But now a few days later I know what I want to say about the race. Here it is, I went to the race with the goal of qualifying for the world championships next year in Penticton and I did that finishing first overall in my age group to win the national championships and although I crossed the line 2nd overall a few people from the second wave had a quicker time than me so I finished 6th overall --one person in another wave beat me by a single second although I didn't see them the entire race, and really it doesn't matter how much I was hurting I think I could've eaked out one more second given how much time I was taking at some aid stations. Still 6th overall in a race that included competitors from over 40 states across the US and more than 20 countries is not too bad. Not to mention, of course it was disappointing not getting the four hours that I was on pace for at the 8k mark of the run, but a 4:16 half ironman is still a pretty elite time I think and one that qualifies me to submit my application next year to compete as a professional triathlete. On top of that I learned so much about the distance and what it takes to be successful in the distance with regard to my pacing, my nutrition and even things like what it is like to travel to a race and coping with the different routines than home. All in all, I do believe that this will be like my first marathon when I was only 18 years old where I ran 3:11 and change and to my second a few months later running about 16 minutes faster in 2:56 (and then fourth was 2:34) just because I had experienced what the distance feels like and what to expect. I am proud of myself and how I fought and battled out there, and that I never gave up not once even with every ounce of my body telling me to stop. Nobody can ever question my ability to power through and persevere after this race. 

I will update you In my next post to about my plans going into the winter and a preliminary schedule for next season, but until then it's time to really relax and let my body head to toe heal. I will also just update this post in probably another day and add in the pictures from the race once they come out.